While much of the media focused on the Dow’s daily movements as it hovered ever so close to the 20,000 mark, markets witnessed another, potentially more important, milestone recently. Three-month LIBOR, or the London Interbank Offered Rate, breached 1.00%.1 LIBOR is one of the most widely used benchmarks for short-term interest rates and reflects the average estimated rate at which banks borrow from one another to fund short-term cash needs. LIBOR rates are quoted in a range of currencies and maturities. It’s tied to trillions of dollars of consumer and commercial loans, including the senior secured loan market.

So why do I think LIBOR deserves just as much attention and fanfare for reaching a paltry rate of approximately 1.02%? With LIBOR rising above 1.00%, the coupons of potentially billions of dollars of senior secured loans will begin to reset at higher rates, which may help drive increased demand – and potentially boost prices – for the asset class.

Source: J.P. Morgan High Yield and Leveraged Loan Morning Intelligence, December 1, 2016. 75 bps 100 bps 125 bps 150 bps PERCENT OF LOAN MARKET (WITH LIBOR FLOORS) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 19% 75% 5% 1%

Virtually the entire senior secured loan market features LIBOR floors of 1.00% or lower.2 What’s a LIBOR floor? It’s a minimum rate of yield a lender would earn should LIBOR drop below a certain level. LIBOR floors became prevalent in the senior secured loan market as LIBOR fell precipitously during and after the 2008 financial crisis. In plain English, a hypothetical loan with a LIBOR floor of 1.00% priced at LIBOR plus 7.50% would provide investors with an all-in coupon of 8.50% (even if LIBOR is only 0.50%). If LIBOR rises to 1.50%, the coupon of our hypothetical loan would reset over time to 9.0% (LIBOR rate of 1.50% + 7.50% coupon).

A long time coming
LIBOR had been well below 1.00% since early 2009. This important rate hovered around or below 0.50% from June 2009 straight through 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 and most of 2015. Then, after more than five years of relative stability at 0.50% or lower, the benchmark started to rise at the end of 2015. LIBOR again “spiked” in the second half of 2016 in response to the implementation of U.S. money market reforms as well as the seemingly pro-growth implications of the U.S. election results. Most recently, its continued appreciation has been consistent with the broader direction of other major interest rate benchmarks, including the 10-year Treasury note, which rose rather dramatically in the final quarter of 2016.3

January 2, 2003 September 13, 2016 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 0% 3-MONTH LIBOR OVER TIME Source: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, http://bit.ly/2dn3Kt7.


Lower for longer?
Even as rates inch their way up from recent lows, it’s important to keep in mind that the major interest rates (three-month LIBOR, 10-year Treasury note, and the federal funds rate, among them) all remain very low from a historical perspective.

LIBOR’s roughly 41 basis point rise from 0.61% to 1.02% in January 2017, for example, still pales in comparison to its approximately 375 basis point rise from 1.30% in 2003 to 5.15% in 2007.1 And with yields on the 5- and 10-year U.S. Treasury note currently well below 2.50% and 3.00%, respectively, major rates remain close to the lowest levels markets have seen stretching to the 1950s.4 As my colleague Senior Economist Lara Rhame has pointed out, given the still relatively weak fundamentals underlying today’s economy, interest rates could remain relatively low from a historical perspective through the coming quarters and years.

Should interest rates decline below the LIBOR floor once again, the presence of such a floor would continue to provide investors in floating rate securities with a level of certain income. If rates continue to climb, investors might look to these investments as a differentiated source of income as well as a potential hedge against rising rates.


1 Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, http://bit.ly/2dn3Kt7.
2 J.P. Morgan High Yield and Leveraged Loan Morning Intelligence, December 1, 2016.
3 Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, http://bit.ly/29ecBfp.
4 Macrobond.


This information is educational in nature and does not constitute a financial promotion, investment advice or an inducement or incitement to participate in any product, offering or investment. FS Investments is not adopting, making a recommendation for or endorsing any investment strategy or particular security. All views, opinions and positions expressed herein are that of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions or positions of FS Investments. All opinions are subject to change without notice, and you should always obtain current information and perform due diligence before participating in any investment. FS Investments does not provide legal or tax advice and the information herein should not be considered legal or tax advice. Tax laws and regulations are complex and subject to change, which can materially impact any investment result. FS Investments cannot guarantee that the information herein is accurate, complete, or timely. FS Investments makes no warranties with regard to such information or results obtained by its use, and disclaims any liability arising out of your use of, or any tax position taken in reliance on, such information.

Any projections, forecasts and estimates contained herein are based upon certain assumptions that the author considers reasonable. Projections are necessarily speculative in nature, and it can be expected that some or all of the assumptions underlying the projections will not materialize or will vary significantly from actual results. The inclusion of projections herein should not be regarded as a representation or guarantee regarding the reliability, accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein, and neither FS Investments nor the author are under any obligation to update or keep current such information.

All investing is subject to risk, including the possible loss of the money you invest.