Strategy note

Going for growth: Middle market private equity secondaries

If you are going for growth, what has a better risk/reward profile than middle market private equity secondaries?

Read now
September 18, 2024 | 14 minute read

After delving deep into attractive current opportunities for income in private credit over the last two strategy notes, “Are private credit markets too good to be true—Or just factually true?” and “Private credit: Opportunities to seize and risks to avoid,” let’s turn our attention back to growth.

Middle market private equity secondaries: A better growth risk/reward profile

As the title of this strategy note suggests, we continue to search for an alternative growth risk/reward profile than middle market private equity secondaries (preferably in a tax efficient manner)—and we keep coming up empty.

Both middle market PE primary and co-investments have more potential to the upside if things go well (and we love both opportunities in today’s market environment), but with more risk per incremental unit of upside (it would seem the efficient frontier1 holds!). But if you are looking for growth with as little risk as possible to an unforeseen recession or market calamity, middle market private equity secondaries continue to shine as a sustained beacon of market opportunity.

Unless you are for some unknown reason still enamored with tomfoolery-driven investment theses focused on growth internationally—where there has been, and continues to be, a paucity of monetizable growth opportunities (ah, remember the golden days of the BRICs?)—then you likely have already rationally settled on the U.S. as the place to invest for growth.

What are your options for growth?

The straightforward options for growth in the United States are: 1) market cap weighted U.S. listed equities, 2) venture capital, 3) large/mega cap private equity and 4) middle market private equity. Here is how each of these four options compare.

  • The efficient frontier: The efficient frontier is the set of optimal portfolios that offer the highest expected return for a defined level of risk or the lowest risk for a given level of expected return. Portfolios that lie below the efficient frontier are sub-optimal because they do not provide enough return for the level of risk. Portfolios that cluster to the right of the efficient frontier are sub-optimal because they have a higher level of risk for the defined rate of return.

This information is educational in nature and does not constitute a financial promotion, investment advice or an inducement or incitement to participate in any product, offering or investment. FS Investments is not adopting, making a recommendation for or endorsing any investment strategy or particular security. All views, opinions and positions expressed herein are that of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions or positions of FS Investments. All opinions are subject to change without notice, and you should always obtain current information and perform due diligence before participating in any investment. FS Investments does not provide legal or tax advice and the information herein should not be considered legal or tax advice. Tax laws and regulations are complex and subject to change, which can materially impact any investment result. FS Investments cannot guarantee that the information herein is accurate, complete, or timely. FS Investments makes no warranties with regard to such information or results obtained by its use, and disclaims any liability arising out of your use of, or any tax position taken in reliance on, such information.

Any projections, forecasts and estimates contained herein are based upon certain assumptions that the author considers reasonable. Projections are necessarily speculative in nature, and it can be expected that some or all of the assumptions underlying the projections will not materialize or will vary significantly from actual results. The inclusion of projections herein should not be regarded as a representation or guarantee regarding the reliability, accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein, and neither FS Investments nor the author are under any obligation to update or keep current such information.

All investing is subject to risk, including the possible loss of the money you invest.

Troy A. Gayeski, CFA

Chief Market Strategist

Search our site