5 reasons to watch out for higher volatility

Volatility re-emerged in 2018 with a vengeance, creating challenges for investors who have become complacent by last year’s placid conditions.

Lara Rhame
July 30, 2019 | 2 minute read

Volatility re-emerged in 2018 with a vengeance, creating challenges for investors who have become complacent by last year’s placid conditions. In 2017, the markets enjoyed a Goldilocks environment by any measure, with realized volatility at 5.34%, the lowest on record going back to 1928, when the index was created.¹ Low volatility tends to correlate with strong returns, as seen in the S&P 500 returning a generous 19.4%.

In stark contrast, 2018 is proving to be markedly more volatile. While it is typical for a low-volatility year to be followed by one with higher volatility and lower returns, investors could benefit from understanding the top 5 reasons behind what’s driving higher volatility and what could further amplify choppy markets going forward.

  1. Some of this is cyclical. Keep in mind that our economic expansion turned nine years old in June, making it the second longest expansion since World War II. No one can know when, but the pendulum is destined to swing back.
  2. Blame or credit the Fed. The Federal Reserve initiated a cautious rate hike cycle in December 2015. Almost three years later, the Fed is gaining confidence and conviction emboldened by the economy racing at a pace above its potential growth. It now expects to raise rates four times in 2018, reflecting the low, and falling, unemployment rate and activity around renormalizing rates. When the Fed expresses intent to tighten monetary policy, markets rightly take notice and volatility often follows. It is troubling that a Fed rate hike cycle has proceeded each of the last three recessions.
  3. The prospect of trade wars looms. Protectionist trade policies have also caused significant market volatility, as uncertainty about escalation and retaliation of tariffs affects large multi-national companies, many of which have international revenue and supply chains.
  4. Passive investing prevails. This trend has concentrated investments in an increasingly smaller number of companies. While ETFs were in part created to offer a simple way to diversify, they have done the opposite. In 2017, 33% of S&P 500 gains for the year were driven by only 10 companies. But indiscriminate buying begets indiscriminate selling.
  5. The Fed is deleveraging its balance sheet. When this policy began in 2017, the Fed was transparent and minimized market disruption. While the Fed was slowly deleveraging, the ECB and the BoJ together added over $2 trillion to their balance sheets in 2017. In 2018, the major global central banks are expected to add less than $500 billion to their balance sheets, and 2019 could see even less. We simply have no historic precedent for major central banks deleveraging. If a massive inflow of liquidity arguably contributed to record low volatility, then the reduction or even removal of liquidity could well amplify volatility going forward.

Volatility is a challenge to advisors managing investment portfolios, but it can be downright terrifying for investors, particularly retirees. In a world where traditional assets are increasingly correlated, diversification will be critical to minimize the disruption to steady asset growth.

  • Annual weekly volatility, data sourced from S&P.

This information is educational in nature and does not constitute a financial promotion, investment advice or an inducement or incitement to participate in any product, offering or investment. FS Investments is not adopting, making a recommendation for or endorsing any investment strategy or particular security. All views, opinions and positions expressed herein are that of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions or positions of FS Investments. All opinions are subject to change without notice, and you should always obtain current information and perform due diligence before participating in any investment. FS Investments does not provide legal or tax advice and the information herein should not be considered legal or tax advice. Tax laws and regulations are complex and subject to change, which can materially impact any investment result. FS Investments cannot guarantee that the information herein is accurate, complete, or timely. FS Investments makes no warranties with regard to such information or results obtained by its use, and disclaims any liability arising out of your use of, or any tax position taken in reliance on, such information.

Any projections, forecasts and estimates contained herein are based upon certain assumptions that the author considers reasonable. Projections are necessarily speculative in nature, and it can be expected that some or all of the assumptions underlying the projections will not materialize or will vary significantly from actual results. The inclusion of projections herein should not be regarded as a representation or guarantee regarding the reliability, accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein, and neither FS Investments nor the author are under any obligation to update or keep current such information.

All investing is subject to risk, including the possible loss of the money you invest.

Lara Rhame

Chief U.S. Economist + Managing Director

Search our site